UK social care reform: Burnham seeks cross-party deal as crisis deepens

Prime Minister Andy Burnham calls for cross-party talks to fix UK social care, as funding gaps and workforce shortages push the system to breaking point.

UK social care reform: Burnham seeks cross-party deal as crisis deepens
Photo by Daniel Tafjord on Unsplash

The UK’s social care system stands at a crossroads this week as Prime Minister Andy Burnham extends an unprecedented invitation to Conservative and Liberal Democrat leaders to join talks aimed at overhauling the sector. In a speech set to be delivered in Manchester, Burnham is expected to frame the crisis as a national priority that transcends party lines, warning that "the time for political point-scoring is over" when millions of vulnerable Britons face gaps in care.

The move comes as local authorities across England report record delays in hospital discharges due to insufficient care home capacity, with the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) estimating that 1.8 million people are now waiting for care assessments or services—up 20% from last year. In Wales, the situation is equally dire: a recent audit revealed that 40% of care workers left the sector in 2025, exacerbating staffing shortages that have left some councils unable to meet even basic needs.

Why cross-party talks could break the deadlock

Social care reform has stalled for decades, with successive governments accused of kicking the can down the road. The last major attempt—a 2021 proposal to cap lifetime care costs at £86,000—collapsed amid opposition backlash over funding mechanisms. Burnham’s approach now hinges on creating a "national care covenant," a legally binding framework that would commit all parties to long-term funding solutions, including a hypothecated tax or social insurance model.

The Prime Minister’s office has not released details of the proposed funding mechanism, but leaks suggest a hybrid system combining general taxation with mandatory employer contributions. This would mark a significant shift from the current means-tested model, which leaves many middle-income families facing catastrophic costs. According to the Health Foundation, the average 65-year-old today will spend £120,000 on care in their lifetime—double the figure from 2010.

The workforce crisis: a system on the brink

Behind the funding debate lies a deeper problem: the care sector’s inability to attract and retain staff. Wages in the sector remain stubbornly low, with the median hourly pay for care workers at £11.20—barely above the National Living Wage. A 2026 report by Skills for Care found that 1 in 3 care workers leave their jobs within a year, citing burnout, lack of progression, and better-paying opportunities in retail or hospitality.

The government has pledged to introduce a "Care Workers’ Charter" later this year, which would guarantee minimum training standards and portable qualifications. However, unions argue that without wage increases, such measures will fail to stem the exodus. Christina McAnea, general secretary of Unison, told NewsMatin that "care workers are the backbone of the NHS, yet they’re treated like an afterthought. You can’t fix social care without fixing pay."

The political tightrope

Burnham’s overture to the opposition is not without risk. The Conservatives have already accused the government of "political grandstanding," pointing to Labour’s 2019 manifesto pledge to create a National Care Service—a promise that remains unfulfilled. Meanwhile, the Lib Dems, who have long advocated for free personal care (as in Scotland), are pushing for immediate funding increases to prevent further collapses of care providers.

The stakes are particularly high for the devolved nations. In Northern Ireland, where social care is fully integrated with health services, the system is on the verge of collapse after years of underfunding. A recent Stormont report warned that without emergency funding, some trusts may be unable to pay staff by the end of the year.

What happens next?

The first cross-party meeting is scheduled for September, with Burnham aiming to present a draft agreement to Parliament by the end of the year. However, experts warn that even if a deal is reached, implementation could take years. "The danger is that we end up with another fudge," said Sally Warren, director of policy at the King’s Fund. "Social care needs a radical overhaul, not just another sticking plaster."

For now, the human cost continues to mount. In a care home in Bristol, staff report that residents are being left in bed for up to 16 hours a day due to staff shortages. In Leeds, a 92-year-old woman with dementia waited 18 months for a care package—only to be told last week that her local authority could no longer afford it. As Burnham prepares to address the nation, the question remains: can politics deliver where it has failed for so long?