UK-EU relations under review as Malaysia deports Myanmar migrants amid global tensions
Andy Burnham’s Brexit review and Malaysia’s forced repatriations to Myanmar test UK foreign policy, while record ocean warming and energy price surges reshape global stability.
The morning after Andy Burnham stood before Labour’s annual conference and declared Brexit had “done more harm than good”, the prime minister’s pledge to review the UK’s relationship with the European Union has already begun to reverberate across Westminster and Brussels. In Kuala Lumpur, meanwhile, the first of 5,000 Myanmar nationals boarded flights back to a country still convulsed by civil war, a move the United Nations has warned could amount to refoulement. Together, the two stories sketch a geopolitical fault line: one nation reassessing its place in the world, another enforcing borders with little regard for the consequences.
A Brexit reckoning, but no quick fixes
Burnham’s announcement on Tuesday was not a call to rejoin the EU, nor even a promise of a second referendum. Instead, he has ordered a comprehensive review of the UK’s post-Brexit settlement, with options to be presented ahead of the next UK-EU summit in late November. The prime minister’s language was measured—“lay out options,” not “reverse course”—but the shift in tone from his predecessor is unmistakable. Where Liz Truss once spoke of a “Global Britain” unbound by European constraints, Burnham’s government is now openly questioning whether the current arrangement serves the UK’s economic and security interests.
The review will cover everything from regulatory alignment in financial services to the reintroduction of free movement for workers in key sectors. Yet even the most ardent Remainers in Burnham’s cabinet acknowledge that rejoining the EU is politically fraught. Public opinion remains divided, and the Labour leadership has ruled out a referendum before the next general election. What is more likely, according to officials briefed on the process, is a series of incremental steps: closer cooperation on defence, a partial return to the single market for goods, and a loosening of visa rules for EU nationals in sectors facing acute labour shortages.
For Brussels, the UK’s overture is a test of its own willingness to compromise. The European Commission has already signalled that any renegotiation would require the UK to accept the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in areas of shared regulation—a non-starter for many Conservative MPs. Yet with the UK economy stagnating and business groups clamouring for relief from post-Brexit trade barriers, the political calculus may be shifting. As one senior EU diplomat put it: “We are not reopening the withdrawal agreement, but we are not closing the door to evolution either.”
Malaysia’s deportations: a gamble with human lives
While the UK grapples with its European future, Malaysia has embarked on a far more immediate—and contentious—policy shift. On Tuesday, the government began repatriating 1,500 Myanmar nationals, the first tranche of a planned 5,000 deportations. Kuala Lumpur insists the returns are voluntary, but human rights groups have cast doubt on the claim, pointing to reports of detainees being pressured into signing consent forms. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees has warned that the policy could violate international law, particularly for those fleeing persecution in Myanmar’s ongoing civil conflict.
The deportations come at a time of rising anti-migrant sentiment in Malaysia, where public anger over economic stagnation has increasingly been directed at foreign workers. The government’s move is widely seen as an attempt to placate domestic critics ahead of a general election expected next year. Yet the policy risks alienating key allies, including the UK, which has been a vocal advocate for Myanmar’s pro-democracy movement. British officials have privately expressed concern that the deportations could undermine efforts to isolate Myanmar’s military junta, which has been accused of war crimes by the International Criminal Court.
For the deportees, the stakes could not be higher. Many of those being sent back are ethnic minorities, including Rohingya Muslims, who face systematic discrimination and violence in Myanmar. One detainee, a 28-year-old Rohingya man who asked not to be named, told The Guardian that he had fled Myanmar after his village was burned by the military. “They say we are going back to safety,” he said. “But there is no safety for us there.”
The ocean’s silent crisis: a record heatwave
Beneath the surface of these political dramas, a quieter but no less consequential shift is underway. The world’s oceans absorbed a record 23 zettajoules of heat last year—equivalent to the energy released by 400 million Hiroshima-sized atomic bombs. The findings, published in a report by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), underscore the accelerating pace of global warming and its disproportionate impact on marine ecosystems.
The implications are far-reaching. Warmer oceans fuel more intense hurricanes, disrupt fisheries that millions rely on for food, and accelerate the melting of polar ice sheets, contributing to rising sea levels. In the UK, the government’s response has been to double down on adaptation. On Wednesday, Environment Secretary Angela Eagle announced a £500 million initiative to plant half a million trees across England over the next three years, part of a broader effort to restore wetlands and riverbanks as natural flood defences. The move is a tacit acknowledgment that even the most ambitious emissions targets will not spare the UK from the effects of climate change already in motion.
Yet the UK’s efforts, while welcome, are a drop in the ocean compared to the scale of the challenge. The IPCC report warns that without a dramatic reduction in global emissions, ocean temperatures could rise by another 0.5°C by 2050, triggering irreversible changes to marine life. For a country with over 11,000 miles of coastline, the stakes are existential.
Energy prices surge as Middle East tensions bite
As if the geopolitical and climatic pressures were not enough, British households are bracing for another financial blow. Energy bills are set to rise by £276 a year from January, according to forecasts by Cornwall Insight, as the fallout from the Iran-Israel conflict continues to roil global energy markets. The 16% increase in the government’s price cap will push the average annual dual-fuel bill to nearly £2,000, heaping further pressure on households already struggling with the cost-of-living crisis.
The surge in prices is a direct consequence of disruptions to oil and gas supplies from the Middle East, where attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz have sent insurance premiums soaring. While the UK is less dependent on Iranian oil than it was a decade ago, the global nature of energy markets means that even regional conflicts can have far-reaching consequences. The government has ruled out reintroducing the energy price cap that shielded consumers during the height of the Ukraine war, arguing that such measures are unsustainable in the long term. Instead, it is pinning its hopes on a rapid expansion of renewable energy, though critics say the timeline is too slow to avert a winter of discontent.
What this means for the UK’s place in the world
Taken together, these developments paint a picture of a country—and a world—grappling with overlapping crises. The UK’s review of its EU relationship is a recognition that Brexit has not delivered the promised dividends, but it is also a sign of pragmatism in an era of geopolitical instability. Malaysia’s deportations, meanwhile, are a stark reminder of the human cost of populist policies, even as they underscore the limits of Western influence in Southeast Asia.
For Burnham, the challenge will be to navigate these tensions without overpromising. A closer relationship with the EU could ease economic pressures, but it will not solve the UK’s deeper structural problems: an ageing population, a housing crisis, and a public sector stretched to breaking point. Similarly, while the government’s climate adaptation plans are a step in the right direction, they are no substitute for the kind of global cooperation needed to avert the worst effects of warming.
One thing is clear: the UK is no longer an island in the metaphorical sense. Whether it is the ripple effects of Middle Eastern conflicts on energy prices or the moral dilemmas posed by Malaysia’s deportations, the country’s fortunes are increasingly tied to decisions made far beyond its shores. The question is not whether the UK can go it alone, but whether it can afford not to.